I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on P3s for the AEC industry. If you want to know more about the P3 book or the PSMJ newsletter, contact them at http://www.psmj.com/.California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is a proponent of P3s, having passed legislation that facilitates their use. In April 2009, Schwarzenegger announced a $32 million public-private partnership designed to reduce the health care worker shortage in the state. And in November 2008, he trumpeted a public-private partnership between the State of California and the Northern Sierra Partnership to fund environmental preservation while supporting economic growth. For the latter project, advocates raised $25 million in private funds.
These projects are notable for many reasons, not the least of which is the fact that they are a departure from the types of project that many people think of when P3s are mentioned – namely, toll roads or public works infrastructure.
The New York State Commission on Asset Maximization (NYSAM) (Albany, NY) wrote in December 2008, “Over the past decade, we have seen rapid advances in infrastructure, technology, and renewable energy development across the United Kingdom, Europe, Canada, and China due to innovative arrangements with the private sector that have helped deliver projects with greater speed, efficiency, and reduced costs. Alternative approaches have been used to deliver all forms of infrastructure, including non-revenue producing assets.”
P3 Opportunities and RisksNYSAM was established by Governor David A. Paterson and charged with broadly examining whether asset maximization can benefit New York State, as well as whether any specific New York State assets are suitable candidates for public-private partnerships.
In its December preliminary report to the governor, NYSAM wrote, “A key goal of asset maximization involves the reallocation of risk from the public sector to the private sector. This shift incentivizes the private sector to pursue design, construction and management strategies that will increase efficiency. Additionally, it insures public entities from incurring additional unforeseen costs. At its most effective, it also protects public entities from incurring unforeseen and incremental costs.”
This shift of risk, which is a factor that makes P3s attractive to the public sector perhaps as much or more than for funding reasons, was the topic of a Design Professional Roundtable hosted by Donovan Hatem, LLP (Boston, MA). David Hatem, an attorney well-known for his expertise in A/E matters, predicts, “Interest in (P3) projects at the local, state and federal levels will continue and substantially increase in the next few years and continue strongly into the next decade.”
In his April 23 presentation, entitled “Public-Private Partnerships: Opportunities and Risks,” Hatem noted that private firms participating in P3s may find themselves on unfamiliar legal ground. “Risks not typically dealt with by private entities may be transferred to them in a P3. Some of this is not insurable risk.”
jag
When you use the phrase "labor shortage" or "talent shortage" you're speaking in a sentence fragment. What you actually have to say is: "There is a labor shortage at the salary level I'm willing to pay." That statement is the correct phrase; the complete sentence, the intellectually honest statement.
ReplyDeleteIf you start raising your wages and improving working conditions, and continue to do so, eventually you'll have people lining up around the block to work for you even if you need to have huge piles of steaming manure hand-scooped on a blazing summer afternoon.
Re: Shortage due to retirees: With the majority of retirement accounts down about 50% or more, people entering retirement age are being forced to work well into their sunset years. So, you won’t be getting a worker shortage anytime soon due to retirees exiting the workforce.
If your job requires training and/or certification, again, raise your wages and improve benefits! You’ll incentivize people to self-fund their education so that they can enter the industry in a work-ready state. The attractive wages, working conditions and career prospects of technology during the 1980’s and 1990’s was a prime example of people’s willingness to fund their own education.
Thanks for the input, though I think it somewhat misses the point of the article. I intended the reference to the California P3 agreement for health care wokers as simply an example of Gov. Schwarzenegger's commitment to P3s. Whether there is or there is not a health care worker shortage in California, the government and Governor clearly perceive there to be one.
ReplyDeleteMy sense is that the "shortage" speaks to a lack of people qualified to work in jobs the health care industry needs for the compensation it is willing to pay. So in that sense, Anonymous is probably correct.